<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Anytime-Valid Linear Models and Regression Adjusted Causal Inference in Randomized Experiments · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.08589/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.08589/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Anytime-Valid Linear Models and Regression Adjusted Causal Inference in Randomized Experiments — mentioned by gatopingado</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41211018</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.08589:41211018</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2024 17:39:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is correct. There&amp;#x27;s been a lot of interest in e-values and non-parametric confidence sequences in recent literature. It&amp;#x27;s usually refered to as anytime-valid inference [1]. Evan Miller explored a similar idea in [2]. For some practical examples, see my Python library [3] implementing multinomial and time inhomogeneous Bernoulli / Poisson process tests based in [4]. See [5] for linear models / t-tests. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.0194 [2] https://www.evanmiller.org/sequential-ab-testing.html [3] https://github.com/assuncaolfi/savvi/ [4] https://openreview.net/forum?id=a4zg0jiuVi [5]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.08589/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ME</category></item></channel></rss>
