<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mind's Eye: Grounded Language Model Reasoning through Simulation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.05359/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.05359/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Mind's Eye: Grounded Language Model Reasoning through Simulation — mentioned by exhaze</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49014297</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.05359:49014297</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:24:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Not an expert on this, so won’t speculate regarding what traits would create robustness specifically attributed to SVG visual representation capability, but felt you might find this paper on reasoning models trained on physical world video data becoming better at general reasoning interesting: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05359&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.05359/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Mind's Eye: Grounded Language Model Reasoning through Simulation — mentioned by theptip</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34329847</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.05359:34329847</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 19:08:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; And, yes, one can imagine finding a way to “fix this particular bug”. But the point is that the fundamental idea of a generative-language-based AI system like ChatGPT just isn’t a good fit in situations where there are structured computational things to do. Put another way, it’d take “fixing” an almost infinite number of “bugs” to patch up what even an almost-infinitesimal corner of Wolfram|Alpha can achieve in its structured way. I can see why Wolfram is bearish on what might be termed &amp;quot;the naive scaling hypothesis&amp;quot;, i.e. that given more data, LLMs will naturally cease making false…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.05359/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Mind's Eye: Grounded Language Model Reasoning through Simulation — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33303465</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2210.05359:33303465</guid><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2022 00:33:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Grounded Language Model Reasoning Through Simulation&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.05359/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
