<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Flow Matching for Generative Modeling · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.02747/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.02747/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Flow Matching for Generative Modeling — mentioned by ecrasevvv</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49033184</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.02747:49033184</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:42:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, the &amp;quot;Flow Matching paradigm&amp;quot; a simulation-free approach for training Continuous Normalizing Flows (CNFs) based on regressing vector fields of fixed conditional probability paths (original paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02747, MIT Course with practical examples: https://diffusion.csail.mit.edu/2026/index.html). Less formally Flow Matching can be described as &amp;quot;a technique to learn how to transport samples from one distribution to another&amp;quot;. For example we could learn how to transport samples from a simple distribution we can easily sample from (e.g. Gaussian) to a complex distribution…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.02747/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Flow Matching for Generative Modeling — mentioned by jc4p</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44401182</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.02747:44401182</guid><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 23:21:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;i&amp;#x27;ve been trying to keep up with this field (image generation) so here&amp;#x27;s quick notes I took: Claude&amp;#x27;s Summary: &amp;quot;Normalizing flows aren&amp;#x27;t dead, they just needed modern techniques&amp;quot; My Summary: &amp;quot;Transformers aren&amp;#x27;t just for text&amp;quot; 1. SOTA model for likelihood on ImageNet 64×64, first ever sub 3.2 (Bits Per Dimension) prev was 2.99 by a hybrid diffusion model 2. Autoregressive (transformers) approach, right now diffusion is the most popular in this space (it&amp;#x27;s much faster but a diff approach) tl;dr of autoregressive vs diffusion (there&amp;#x27;s also other approaches) Autoregression: step based, generate…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.02747/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Flow Matching for Generative Modeling — mentioned by lnyan</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44045189</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.02747:44045189</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 19:46:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Note that it&amp;#x27;s very likely that Veo models are based on &amp;quot;Flow Matching&amp;quot; [1] [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02747&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.02747/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
