<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ask Me Anything: A simple strategy for prompting language models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.02441/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.02441/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Ask Me Anything: A simple strategy for prompting language models — mentioned by james-revisoai</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35671631</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.02441:35671631</guid><pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2023 22:52:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Prompt engineering made more sense before RLHF/instruct models. Back then text just continued onwards, and many papers found ridiculous gains on conforming with intended output (and therefore properties of output) by finding a suitable widespread online format. Example: I think all Question/Answer forums, and places like StackOverflow, used a certain format like &amp;#x27;Q:&amp;#x27; - that worked much better for question content with high quality answers. One paper, &amp;quot;Ask me anything&amp;quot; showed that formulating tasks as questions-answers resulted in much more effective prompts: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02441…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.02441/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
