<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Model · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.02414/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.02414/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Model — mentioned by fswd</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34404859</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.02414:34404859</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2023 20:03:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;For LLM, INT8 is old news but still exciting. FP8 would definitely be an improvement. However the new coolness is INT4. &amp;gt; Excitingly, we manage to reach the INT4 weight quantization for GLM-130B while existing successes have thus far only come to the INT8 level. Memory-wise, by comparing to INT8, the INT4 version helps additionally save half of the required GPU memory to 70GB, thus allowing GLM130B inference on 4 × RTX 3090 Ti (24G) or 8 × RTX 2080 Ti (11G). Performance-wise, Table 2 left indicates that without post-training at all, the INT4-version GLM-130B experiences almost no performance…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.02414/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Model — mentioned by moyix</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34007793</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.02414:34007793</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:24:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;GPT&amp;#x27;s compression of text is a model of probabilities for the next token in a sequence, where a token is a bit of text from a vocabulary of ~52,000. You can definitely reduce the precision of the parameters that determine that model without hurting the model&amp;#x27;s overall accuracy much (consider truncating a probability like 98.0000001221151240690% to 98.0%). Empirically, people have quantized the weights of language models down to INT4 with very little loss in accuracy; see GLM-130B: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02414&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.02414/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Model — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33154426</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2210.02414:33154426</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 17:56:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-Trained Model&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.02414/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
