<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Game-theoretic statistics and safe anytime-valid inference · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.01948/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.01948/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Game-theoretic statistics and safe anytime-valid inference — mentioned by dccsillag</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42565657</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.01948:42565657</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 12:35:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;If thresholding of P-values is the issue, E-values -- a recent, much more elegant, easier to work with, and more robust alternative to P-values -- solve this. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.08040 https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.00901 https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01948 https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23614&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.01948/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.ST</category></item><item><title>Game-theoretic statistics and safe anytime-valid inference — mentioned by gatopingado</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41211854</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.01948:41211854</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2024 20:08:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for noting! This is the right link for [1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01948&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.01948/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.ST</category></item><item><title>Game-theoretic statistics and safe anytime-valid inference — mentioned by kimukasetsu</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36356377</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.01948:36356377</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 13:37:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The biggest mistake engineers make is determining sample sizes. It is not trivial to determine the sample size for a trial without prior knowledge of effect sizes. Instead of waiting for a fixed sample size, I would recommend using a sequential testing framework: set a stopping condition and perform a test for each new batch of sample units. This is called optional stopping and it is not possible using a classic t-test, since Type I and II errors are only valid at a determined sample size. However, other tests make it possible: see safe anytime-valid statistics [1, 2] or, simply, bayesian…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.01948/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.ST</category></item></channel></rss>
