<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bidirectional Language Models Are Also Few-shot Learners · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.14500/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.14500/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Bidirectional Language Models Are Also Few-shot Learners — mentioned by patelajay285</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42135699</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2209.14500:42135699</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:48:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We found the same result a few years ago in our ICLR paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.14500 We found Google&amp;#x27;s T5 models which were released in 2019, pre-GPT-3, were &amp;quot;secretly&amp;quot; capable of in-context learning with a simple inference technique. Given they use a bidirectional MLM (Masked Language Modeling) objective, it wasn&amp;#x27;t obvious how to do it, but MLM objectives are known to produce better language representations than causal (next token prediction) objectives. We were able to outperform much larger sized GPT-3 models or get very close to their performance with far smaller T5 models.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.14500/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
