<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Entailment Semantics Can Be Extracted from an Ideal Language Model · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.12407/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.12407/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Entailment Semantics Can Be Extracted from an Ideal Language Model — mentioned by genezeta</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33392266</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2209.12407:33392266</guid><pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2022 08:05:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; This week I saw not one but three striking premonitions for how the scaling maximalism hypothesis might end. &amp;gt; 1. There might not be enough data in the world to make scaling maximalism work. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.12407.pdf &amp;gt; 2. There might not be enough available compute in the world to make scaling maximalism feasible. &amp;gt; 3. Some important tasks might simply not scale. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.06177 Note: scaling maximalism hypothesis -&amp;gt; &amp;quot;that AGI might arise from larger scale without fundamental new innovation&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.12407/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
