<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>BQP is not in NP · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.10398/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.10398/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>BQP is not in NP — mentioned by mofeing</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48567231</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2209.10398:48567231</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 07:59:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;No. As far as we know, no realization of a quantum algorithm can solve NP-complete problems in polynomial many steps. Some people that worked on this topic told me that there seems to be some improvements on the quasi-optimal solution found, but that due to the scale of current quantum computers, it just have been tried out on small-sized problems. Theoretically, there are some papers suggesting that there are problems in BQP (the computational model of quantum computers) outside of NP [1] and even, the PH [2] (Polynomial Hierarchy, the infinite hierarchy of composition of NP and co-NP…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.10398/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CC</category></item></channel></rss>
