<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Topological data analysis on noisy quantum computers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.09371/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.09371/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Topological data analysis on noisy quantum computers — mentioned by sanxiyn</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43407283</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2209.09371:43407283</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 01:11:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I used to think only proposal for quantum supremacy on near future NISQ devices is random circuit sampling, for which I think &amp;quot;generate random numbers&amp;quot; is a fair summary. Then someone told me about NISQ-TDA and I can&amp;#x27;t immediately see why this too is BS. But then it is mysterious to me why not everyone is talking about it. So I am not sure. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.09371&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.09371/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
