<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How Much Structure Is Needed for Huge Quantum Speedups? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.06930/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.06930/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How Much Structure Is Needed for Huge Quantum Speedups? — mentioned by pred_</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45673924</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2209.06930:45673924</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 19:23:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Normally, where I come from anyway, verifiability would refer to the ability to prove to a classical skeptic that the quantum device did what it&amp;#x27;s supposed to, cf. e.g. Mahadev (https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.01082), Aaronson (https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.06930), in a strong, theoretical, sense. And that&amp;#x27;s indeed relevant in the context of proving advantage, as the earlier RCS experiments lacked that ability, so “demonstrating verifiable quantum advantage” would be quite the step forward. That doesn&amp;#x27;t appear to be what they did at all though. Indeed, the paper appears to barely touch on…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.06930/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>How Much Structure Is Needed for Huge Quantum Speedups? — mentioned by civilized</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33481930</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2209.06930:33481930</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2022 14:42:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We don&amp;#x27;t. Here&amp;#x27;s a survey paper from quantum computing expert Scott Aaronson, posted to arXiv just a couple months ago: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.06930.pdf From the abstract: &amp;gt; I survey, for a general scientific audience, three decades of research into which sorts of problems admit exponential speedups via quantum computers -- from the classics (like the algorithms of Simon and Shor), to the breakthrough of Yamakawa and Zhandry from April 2022. [...] I make some skeptical remarks about widely-repeated claims of exponential quantum speedups for practical machine learning and optimization…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.06930/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>How Much Structure Is Needed for Huge Quantum Speedups? — mentioned by hackandthink</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33078634</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2209.06930:33078634</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2022 10:52:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Popular Science Background: &amp;quot;Quantum mechanics’ most important resource&amp;quot; (Entangled quantum states) From a Quantum Computing perspective entanglement ist kind of overrated. Scott Aaronson: How Much Structure Is Needed for Huge Quantum Speedups? https://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.06930.pdf Actually entanglement is not mentioned at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.06930/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>How Much Structure Is Needed for Huge Quantum Speedups? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33072797</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2209.06930:33072797</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2022 19:55:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;How Much Structure Is Needed for Quantum Speedups?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.06930/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
