<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Simple Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.01890/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.01890/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Simple Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50149203</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2209.01890:50149203</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 06:56:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A Simple Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis (2022)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.01890/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.GM</category></item><item><title>A Simple Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46211392</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2209.01890:46211392</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 22:05:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A Simple Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.01890/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.GM</category></item><item><title>A Simple Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis — mentioned by raegis</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32833052</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2209.01890:32833052</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 03:31:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Submissions are moderated, but depending on the field, anything reasonable-looking may be accepted. For example, there is more than one &amp;quot;proof&amp;quot; of the Riemann Hypothesis in the arXiv. But the moderation system certainly keeps out spam. Edit: Here&amp;#x27;s a proof of the Riemann hypothesis submitted just last week: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.01890.pdf You can have a little fun exploring &amp;quot;proofs&amp;quot; of famous theorems on the arXiv over the years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.01890/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.GM</category></item></channel></rss>
