<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspective · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.00626/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.00626/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspective — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42354156</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2209.00626:42354156</guid><pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2024 01:02:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspective&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.00626/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspective — mentioned by lhl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35659643</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2209.00626:35659643</guid><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 20:30:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems to me, from a copyright perspective, all commercial use of generative AI depends on whether the output is transformative fair use (vs derived work). While the courts will have its say, ultimately whether new rules are carved out or not is going to be again (as all copyright law is) based on commercial interests - I have the feeling that the potential productivity upside across all industries (and in terms of national interests) is going to be big enough that it&amp;#x27;ll work itself out largely in the favor of generative AI. That being said, IMO, that&amp;#x27;s completely separate from the safety…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.00626/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspective — mentioned by lhl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35484839</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2209.00626:35484839</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 18:10:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The dangers of AGI I don&amp;#x27;t think are very related with consciousness or sentience (maybe the saddest outcome if it killed us all and weren&amp;#x27;t at all). I&amp;#x27;m still catching up on my reading, but the existential risk of AGI as I understand it is chiefly that we don&amp;#x27;t know how to align AI (and keep it aligned) to be beneficial/benevolent for humanity, but the risk is contingent also on a few other things things - that we develop AI that agentic and able to develop and pursue it&amp;#x27;s own goals and sub-goals, and that it has power-seeking or game-theory strategic awareness/planning. The extra dangerous…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.00626/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspective — mentioned by jlei523</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35370166</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2209.00626:35370166</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:37:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;We need to solve AGI now? No, we need to solve the problem of AI alignment, regulation, etc now. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.00626.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.00626/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspective — mentioned by codeflo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35032237</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2209.00626:35032237</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2023 18:08:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;(Added: People really shouldn&amp;#x27;t flag you for asking a question.) The point is &amp;quot;aligning the AI&amp;#x27;s goals with human interests&amp;quot;, i.e. make the AI non-evil. You&amp;#x27;re somewhat lucky to never have gone down that particular rabbit hole. Some strange, but also seemingly very intelligent people on the internet argue that it&amp;#x27;s the most significant extinction risk humanity faces. My impression is that actual AI/ML researchers believe this to be mostly bullshit. (I&amp;#x27;m personally not qualified to decide, just explaining the positions.) The author of this curriculum seems to define it as: &amp;gt; Within the coming…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.00626/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspective — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34862033</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2209.00626:34862033</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2023 21:28:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The alignment problem from a deep learning perspective&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2209.00626/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
