<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>What Do NLP Researchers Believe? Results of the NLP Community Metasurvey · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2208.12852/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2208.12852/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>What Do NLP Researchers Believe? Results of the NLP Community Metasurvey — mentioned by AgentME</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35067912</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2208.12852:35067912</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2023 11:52:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A recent poll of published AI researchers showed a median estimate of a 5% chance AI causes human extinction, with half believing the chance is greater than 10%. https://aiimpacts.org/2022-expert-survey-on-progress-in-ai/ A poll of NLP researchers showed 37% agreed that catastrophic outcomes of AI comparable to nuclear war were plausible. https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.12852&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2208.12852/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>What Do NLP Researchers Believe? Results of the NLP Community Metasurvey — mentioned by gwern</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32667103</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2208.12852:32667103</guid><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 19:25:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Is there actual overconfidence? There isn&amp;#x27;t. Arvind is just making this up. (Anytime a post leads with many controversial major claims and then handwaves away the entire discussion with &amp;quot;We won’t waste your time arguing with these claims.&amp;quot;, while providing almost zero references for anything at all, you should smell something rotten. No no, go right ahead, feel free to &amp;#x27;waste our time&amp;#x27;, you&amp;#x27;re not charging us by the word. By all means, do discuss recent DL work on time-series forecasting and why DL is unable to predict, the industrial/organizational psychology lit on predicting job…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2208.12852/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
