#IStandWithPutin versus #IStandWithUkraine: The interaction of bots and humans in discussion of the Russia/Ukraine war · HackerPapers discussions

#IStandWithPutin versus #IStandWithUkraine: The interaction of bots and humans in discussion of the Russia/Ukraine war — mentioned by kilolima

Tue, 08 Nov 2022 01:36:17 GMT

https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.07038 Also potentially related : https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/3508639-cyber-comma...

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

#IStandWithPutin versus #IStandWithUkraine: The interaction of bots and humans in discussion of the Russia/Ukraine war — mentioned by bArray

Fri, 16 Sep 2022 21:06:33 GMT

> The bots also increase online discussion around motion, observed the research paper, by tweeting posts with words like “moving”, “go”, “going”, “leave”, which are potentially associated with staying or fleeing the country. Pick 'leave'. Is this "I think _we_ should leave" or "I think _they_ should leave". Without context these words could be used in either way. I searched the paper for the word "leave" and it wasn't there, so the article pulled this example from nowhere. I am also not convinced whether the sentiment isn't also just amplified from that of real people. On page 11 of the paper…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

#IStandWithPutin versus #IStandWithUkraine: The interaction of bots and humans in discussion of the Russia/Ukraine war — HN submission

Wed, 07 Sep 2022 02:09:20 GMT

More than 90% of the bots are Pro-Ukrainian, with fewer than 7% pro-Russian

67 points; 50 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

#IStandWithPutin versus #IStandWithUkraine: The interaction of bots and humans in discussion of the Russia/Ukraine war — HN submission

Mon, 05 Sep 2022 19:31:35 GMT

IStandWithPutin vs. IStandWithUkraine: The interactions of bots and humans

3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.