<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Productivity meets Performance: Julia on A64FX · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.12762/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.12762/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Productivity meets Performance: Julia on A64FX — mentioned by adgjlsfhk1</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37601982</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2207.12762:37601982</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 18:34:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s worth noting that the benchmarkgame is including startup time. If you look at the execution time (which is what matters once you start doing more work) the speeds are equal. For example, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.12762.pdf shows Julia beating hand codes BLAS kernels for the 2nd fastest supercomputer in the world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.12762/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item></channel></rss>
