<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Distinguishing Dark Matter, Modified Gravity, and Modified Inertia with the Inner and Outer Parts of Galactic Rotation Curves · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.11069/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.11069/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Distinguishing Dark Matter, Modified Gravity, and Modified Inertia with the Inner and Outer Parts of Galactic Rotation Curves — mentioned by throwaway81523</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37638331</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2207.11069:37638331</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:02:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is from August 3, 2023, so 1.5 months old: has it caused a bigger stir in astrophysics since then? I&amp;#x27;d have expected it to be all over the popsci web (Quanta, Aeon, etc). So I gotta wonder whether it caught on. I think this is the preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.11069 Added: per Ethan Siegel&amp;#x27;s mMdium post (clickbait link to incomplete article): https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/ask-ethan-do-binary-st... &amp;quot;The quick answer is that this result is a confluence of three things: good science, bad science, and the ugly state of science news. Let’s look at what’s truly going on here.&amp;quot;…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.11069/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item></channel></rss>
