HackerPapers

arXiv:2207.10793cs.AR

The Dirty Secret of SSDs: Embodied Carbon

Swamit Tannu, Prashant J. Nair

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Scalable Solid-State Drives (SSDs) have ushered in a transformative era in data storage and accessibility, spanning both data centers and portable devices. However, the strides made in scaling this technology can bear significant environmental consequences. On a global scale, a notable portion of semiconductor manufacturing relies on electricity derived from coal and natural gas sources. A striking example of this is the manufacturing process for a single Gigabyte of Flash memory, which emits approximately 0.16 Kg of CO2 - a considerable fraction of the total carbon emissions attributed to the system. Remarkably, the manufacturing of storage devices alone contributed to an estimated 20 million metric tonnes of CO2 emissions in the year 2021. In light of these environmental concerns, this paper delves into an analysis of the sustainability trade-offs inherent in Solid-State Drives (SSDs) when compared to traditional Hard Disk Drives (HDDs). Moreover, this study proposes methodologies to gauge the embodied carbon costs associated with storage systems effectively. The research encompasses four key strategies to enhance the sustainability of storage systems. In summation, this paper critically addresses the embodied carbon issues associated with SSDs, comparing them with HDDs, and proposes a comprehensive framework of strategies to enhance the sustainability of storage systems.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
Energy Informatics Review (Volume 3 Issue 3, October 2023)
DOI
doi:10.1145/3630614.3630616
Subjects
cs.ARHardware Architecture cs.CYComputers and Society

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2026 to May 2026. Found in 1 HN submission from Jul 2022 to Jul 2022. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Does anyone else find the writing in the article to be overdramatic? Including a 4gb is a negligible amount of space for current hardware and Chrome is not known as the browser to run on resource constrained devices. To put 4gb in context, I currently have 2 *tabs* open that…

      derangedHorseView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.