<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>To what extent can we analyze Kotlin programs using existing Java taint analysis tools? (Extended Version) · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.09379/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.09379/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>To what extent can we analyze Kotlin programs using existing Java taint analysis tools? (Extended Version) — mentioned by belter</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32177349</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2207.09379:32177349</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 09:37:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;...We identified 18 engineering challenges that static-analysis writers need to handle differently due to Kotlin&amp;#x27;s unique constructs or the differences in the generated bytecode between the Kotlin and Java compilers. For eight of them, we provide a conceptual solution, while six of those we implemented as part of SecuCheck-Kotlin, an extension to the existing Java taint analysis SecuCheck...&amp;quot; [PDF]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.09379.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.09379/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.PL</category></item><item><title>To what extent can we analyze Kotlin programs using existing Java taint analysis tools? (Extended Version) — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32177343</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2207.09379:32177343</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 09:36:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Can we analyze Kotlin programs using existing Java taint analysis tools?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.09379/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.PL</category></item></channel></rss>
