HackerPapers

arXiv:2207.07616hep-ph

Parton distributions with scale uncertainties: a MonteCarlo sampling approach

Zahari Kassabov, Maria Ubiali, Cameron Voisey

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We present the MCscales approach for incorporating scale uncertainties in parton distribution functions (PDFs). The new methodology builds on the Monte Carlo sampling for propagating experimental uncertainties into the PDF space that underlies the NNPDF approach, but it extends it to the space of factorisation and renomalisation scales. A prior probability is assigned to each scale combinations set in the theoretical predictions used to obtain each PDF replica in the Monte Carlo ensemble and a posterior probability is obtained by selecting replicas that satisfy fit-quality criteria. Our approach allows one to exactly match the scale variations in the PDFs with those in the computation of the partonic cross sections, thus accounting for the full correlations between the two. We illustrate the opportunities for phenomenological exploration made possible by our methodology for a variety of LHC observables. Sets of PDFs enriched with scale information are provided, along with a set of tools to use them.

arXiv comments
41 pages, 12 figures
Journal reference
JHEP03(2023)148
DOI
doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2023)148
Subjects
hep-phHigh Energy Physics, Phenomenology

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jun 2023 to Jun 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I think this might be the paper this is based on: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP03(2023)148 “ Abstract: We present the MCscales approach for incorporating scale uncertainties in parton distribution functions (PDFs). The new methodology builds on the Monte Carlo…

      zeristorView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.