<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The black hole interior from non-isometric codes and complexity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.06536/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.06536/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The black hole interior from non-isometric codes and complexity — mentioned by kromem</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38650747</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2207.06536:38650747</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 03:46:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Strange you think that. Care to explain why you came to that conclusion? The preprint linked to lays it out more technically if that&amp;#x27;s your jam: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.06536.pdf See section 6 on exterior vs interior measurements, and you can see the discussion in the FAQ about how measurements on the radiation after the Page time creates particles in the interior (which cites section 6 for more details). Then 8.2-3 goes more into what information about the interior can be known from observables in the fundamental description before and after the Page time. The &amp;quot;Previous attempts at an…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.06536/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
