<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Teaching Rotational Physics with Bivectors · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.03560/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.03560/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Teaching Rotational Physics with Bivectors — mentioned by Steuard</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35509379</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2207.03560:35509379</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 05:12:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a very nicely designed site, but I have to grumble a little: bivectors aren&amp;#x27;t a concept unique to geometric algebra! They&amp;#x27;ve been used elsewhere in physics for ages: well before geometric algebra in its current form was developed. (I first encountered them in the Petrov classification of spacetime structures.) So it&amp;#x27;s a bit awkward to see &amp;quot;bivector.net&amp;quot; as a label for geometric algebra resources. (And they&amp;#x27;re not alone: the Wikipedia article on bivectors reads as if geometric algebra is the only context where bivectors are meaningful, too.) In fact, I&amp;#x27;ve recently written a paper[]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.03560/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.ed-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
