<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Pure Transformers are Powerful Graph Learners · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.02505/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.02505/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Pure Transformers are Powerful Graph Learners — mentioned by coffee_am</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37598239</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2207.02505:37598239</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 14:35:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A few considerations come to mind: 1. The O(N^2*d) computation cost of the attention layers. For large graphs (millions of nodes) it&amp;#x27;s quickly too costly. And in some of the social network problems, the more data you feed the better is the inference on average (on a ~log scale). 2. As the paper suggests, in some cases the graph structure has important information. Flattening out everything, or fully connecting the nodes, a more accurate description of what goes on in an attention layer in this scenario, the structure is lost. The structure information can be introduced as a positional…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2207.02505/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
