<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3 · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.14576/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.14576/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3 — mentioned by nl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34951449</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2206.14576:34951449</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:29:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it would be interesting to see benchmarks on that. I tested that example on chatGPT and it was correct, with a really good explanation even when I modified the question away from the example on Wikipedia. Some related results (eg https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.14576.pdf - see &amp;quot;Causal reasoning: Interventions after passive observations&amp;quot; section) indicate it would be competitive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.14576/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
