<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>From chambers to echo chambers: Quantifying polarization with a second-neighbor approach applied to Twitter's climate discussion · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.14501/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.14501/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>From chambers to echo chambers: Quantifying polarization with a second-neighbor approach applied to Twitter's climate discussion — mentioned by anigbrowl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37761962</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2206.14501:37761962</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 07:26:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;To an extent, because attention is a limited (albeit renewable) resource. But I had in mind something closer to terrain, in the strategic/military sense. For example I think Musk bought Twitter not to make money off it but to have strategic control of a piece of near-realtime digital broadcast infrastructure. See also this paper on the structural nature of digital echo chambers: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.14501&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.14501/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SI</category></item></channel></rss>
