<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The curious case of GW200129: interplay between spin-precession inference and data-quality issues · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.11932/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.11932/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The curious case of GW200129: interplay between spin-precession inference and data-quality issues — mentioned by pklo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33329067</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2206.11932:33329067</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:26:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There are only three detectors available (two LIGOs and VIRGO), and the strongest signal unfortunately also had an overlapping glitch, so there are still some data reduction issues that make interpretation difficult: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.11932.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.11932/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
