<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Lightweight Space-based Solar Power Generation and Transmission Satellite · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.08373/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.08373/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Lightweight Space-based Solar Power Generation and Transmission Satellite — mentioned by TeMPOraL</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49039241</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2206.08373:49039241</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:46:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Could we have giant nuclear reactors in space? We could. The usual stumbling block is how to ship fissile material upwell without the risk of a launch failure spreading highly radioactive material over several countries. &amp;gt; What&amp;#x27;s the power loss from beaming down power? I think it&amp;#x27;s about 10% from atmosphere alone, but you have to add losses from other components in the system, including light -&amp;gt; current -&amp;gt; RF and RF -&amp;gt; current legs, and I&amp;#x27;ve seen estimates ranging from 15% to 40% efficiency end to end; this random article includes breakdown with estimates, that multiplies down to 37.5%…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.08373/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.IM</category></item></channel></rss>
