<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.07271/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.07271/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35264484</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2206.07271:35264484</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:40:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Study: We can&amp;#x27;t distinguish AI vs. human self-presentations&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 2 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.07271/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed — mentioned by ftxbro</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35264322</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2206.07271:35264322</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:30:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I wanted to check this. So I tracked down the pnas paper from the press release article, and then I tracked down the 32 page arxiv paper from there https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07271 and it still doesn&amp;#x27;t answer this question from my understanding of the paper. Its main point is &amp;quot;In our three main experiments, using two different language models to generate verbal self-presentations across three social contexts, participants identified the source of a self-presentation with only 50 to 52% accuracy.&amp;quot; They did clarify that their data sets were constructed to be 50% human and 50% AI generated. But…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.07271/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35063240</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2206.07271:35063240</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2023 00:00:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Human Heuristics for AI-Generated Language Are Flawed&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.07271/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed — mentioned by pharrington</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31792158</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2206.07271:31792158</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2022 17:57:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Their preprint is at https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07271&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.07271/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
