<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Probing Parity-Violation with the Four-Point Correlation Function of BOSS Galaxies · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.04227/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.04227/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Probing Parity-Violation with the Four-Point Correlation Function of BOSS Galaxies — mentioned by enriquto</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33878140</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2206.04227:33878140</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 11:19:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#x27;t understand why do they need this complicated algorithm. If there is such a blatant bias then it can be detected by sampling a few million random tetrahedra; and that can be done instantaneously. Also, why don&amp;#x27;t they publish the list of positions of all these galaxies? (Or I couldn&amp;#x27;t find it easily on either of the original articles [0,1]). If there&amp;#x27;s just a million of them, this is around the same size as a single high-resolution color image. Then people can download the positions and find the asymmetries themselves! [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04227 [1]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.04227/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item><item><title>Probing Parity-Violation with the Four-Point Correlation Function of BOSS Galaxies — mentioned by Sniffnoy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33875964</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2206.04227:33875964</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 04:35:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That and https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04227 ; the article links to both of them early on, but it is perhaps easy to miss.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.04227/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
