<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Diffusion-GAN: Training GANs with Diffusion · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.02262/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.02262/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Diffusion-GAN: Training GANs with Diffusion — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44850948</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2206.02262:44850948</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 22:31:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure. This was the paper[0]. Here&amp;#x27;s a few more you might find these interesting. Google&amp;#x27;s Transformer GAN[1] (not a transformer at all resolutions). Diffusion-GAN[2] is a hybrid architecture. Remember that technically the GAN process can use any underlying architecture. Arguably you could say some of the training steps in LLMs are GANs. And I think this one is also interesting in a similar respect[3]. Before PWC went down, StyleSAN[4] was the SOTA on FFHQ, but IIRC this doesn&amp;#x27;t change the architecture so it should probably work on all the other architectures too (comes with compute costs, but…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.02262/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Diffusion-GAN: Training GANs with Diffusion — mentioned by z3c0</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36436532</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2206.02262:36436532</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 18:23:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m not sure that&amp;#x27;s a valid statement on either count. There is plenty of work being done to bolster GANs with diffusion, in an attempt to take GANs where they couldn&amp;#x27;t before. Here&amp;#x27;s one such example: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.02262 You might&amp;#x27;ve been more correct to say that diffusion surpassed prior generative models, but the adversarial element doesn&amp;#x27;t even compare to diffusion at all. The adversarial element would be more accurately seen as a trade-off for standard RLHF/Human-in-the-Loop models. I will bet money that GANs bolstered with diffusion will far outperform a standalone…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2206.02262/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
