HackerPapers

arXiv:2206.01278cs.LG

Lottery Tickets on a Data Diet: Finding Initializations with Sparse Trainable Networks

Mansheej Paul, Brett W. Larsen, Surya Ganguli, Jonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

A striking observation about iterative magnitude pruning (IMP; Frankle et al. 2020) is that $\unicode{x2014}$ after just a few hundred steps of dense training $\unicode{x2014}$ the method can find a sparse sub-network that can be trained to the same accuracy as the dense network. However, the same does not hold at step 0, i.e. random initialization. In this work, we seek to understand how this early phase of pre-training leads to a good initialization for IMP both through the lens of the data distribution and the loss landscape geometry. Empirically we observe that, holding the number of pre-training iterations constant, training on a small fraction of (randomly chosen) data suffices to obtain an equally good initialization for IMP. We additionally observe that by pre-training only on "easy" training data, we can decrease the number of steps necessary to find a good initialization for IMP compared to training on the full dataset or a randomly chosen subset. Finally, we identify novel properties of the loss landscape of dense networks that are predictive of IMP performance, showing in particular that more examples being linearly mode connected in the dense network correlates well with good initializations for IMP. Combined, these results provide new insight into the role played by the early phase training in IMP.

arXiv comments
The first two authors contributed equally
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.AIArtificial Intelligence stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2023 to May 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Research [0] suggests that pretraining to uncover sparse subnetworks is faster when using "easy" subsets of the training data. Very small part of the overall picture but I do expect to see more research on data hashing/subsetting/ordering for training optimization in the near…

      nmfisherView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.