<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>ADM mass in warp drive spacetimes · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.15950/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.15950/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>ADM mass in warp drive spacetimes — mentioned by eesmith</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32046002</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2205.15950:32046002</guid><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2022 16:15:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;From 2021? Stick it into Google Scholar. 26 citations. Abstract from https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.03079.pdf from Feb. 2022: &amp;gt; Three recent articles have claimed that it is possible to, at least in theory, either set up positive energy warp drives satisfying the weak energy condition (WEC), or at the very least, to minimize the WEC violations. These claims are at best incomplete, since the arguments as presented only assert but do not prove the existence of one set of timelike observers, the co-moving Eulerian observers, who see relatively “nice” physics. While these particular observers might…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.15950/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
