<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The full range of uniform bounds for the bilinear Hilbert transform · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.09851/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.09851/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The full range of uniform bounds for the bilinear Hilbert transform — mentioned by guraltsev</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31519667</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2205.09851:31519667</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 15:37:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently converted myself to using TeXmacs. I did it because I was constantly getting lost in the minutiae of proofs of a large paper I was working on [1] The WYSIWYG aspect of TeXmacs was crucial for me because I was able to &amp;quot;think about math&amp;quot; while working on the PC. When doing things in LaTeX I always found myself thinking on paper and then writing down in TeX. I personally believe that &amp;quot;thinking on paper&amp;quot; is still better for me at the starting stage of mathematical research. However, once the outline of the proof was clear and I needed to clean up details and to write technical proofs…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.09851/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CA</category></item><item><title>The full range of uniform bounds for the bilinear Hilbert transform — mentioned by guraltsev</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31519502</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2205.09851:31519502</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2022 15:25:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently published a paper [1] that I wrote using TeXmacs and then converted to LaTeX before publishing it on arXiv. The conversion was not completely seamless: it took me around 2 hours to tweak it to my liking. However, I feel that I would not have been able to finish the paper without TeXmacs. Honestly, 2 hours was a fair trade-off. Probably I would have spent a similar amount of time aligning equations by hand once I was done with writing. Texmacs -&amp;gt; LaTeX conversion actually made that part more streamlined. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.09851&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.09851/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CA</category></item></channel></rss>
