HackerPapers

arXiv:2205.08061physics.pop-ph

Impact of Economic Constraints on the Projected Timeframe for Human-Crewed Deep Space Exploration

Philip E. Rosen, Dan Zhang, Jonathan H. Jiang, Leopold Van Ijzendoorn, Kristen A. Fahy, Zong-Hong Zhu

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Deep space exploration offers the most profound opportunity for the expansion of humanity and our understanding of the Universe, but remains extremely challenging. Progress will continue to be paced by uncrewed missions followed up by crewed missions to ever further destinations. Major space powers continue to invest in crewed deep space exploration as an important national strategy. An improved model based on previous work is developed, which projects the earliest possible launch dates for human-crewed missions from cis-lunar space to selected destinations in the Solar System and beyond based on NASA's historic budget trend and overall development trends of deep space exploration research. The purpose of the analysis is to provide a projected timeframe for crewed missions beyond Mars. Our findings suggest the first human missions from a spacefaring nation or international collaboration to the Asteroid Belt and Jovian System could be scheduled as soon as ~2071 to ~2087 and ~2101 to ~2121, respectively, while a launch to the Saturn System may occur by the year ~2132, with an uncertainty window of ~2129 to ~2153.

arXiv comments
10 pages, 5 figures
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.3390/galaxies10040088
Subjects
physics.pop-phPopular Physics astro-ph.EPEarth and Planetary Astrophysics astro-ph.IMInstrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics physics.soc-phPhysics and Society

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2022 to May 2022. Found in 1 HN submission from May 2022 to May 2022. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Clickbaity simplification of an arxiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.08061 There are other preprints of a similar nature: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.01730 Take my advice. Visit arxiv.org, avoid this rubbish article.

      bediger4000View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.