HackerPapers

arXiv:2205.07333cs.HC

Trucks Don't Mean Trump: Diagnosing Human Error in Image Analysis

J. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Jerry Chen, Emily Wen, Allison Koenecke, Nikhil Garg, Emma Pierson

Abstract

Algorithms provide powerful tools for detecting and dissecting human bias and error. Here, we develop machine learning methods to to analyze how humans err in a particular high-stakes task: image interpretation. We leverage a unique dataset of 16,135,392 human predictions of whether a neighborhood voted for Donald Trump or Joe Biden in the 2020 US election, based on a Google Street View image. We show that by training a machine learning estimator of the Bayes optimal decision for each image, we can provide an actionable decomposition of human error into bias, variance, and noise terms, and further identify specific features (like pickup trucks) which lead humans astray. Our methods can be applied to ensure that human-in-the-loop decision-making is accurate and fair and are also applicable to black-box algorithmic systems.

arXiv comments
To be published in FAccT 2022
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.HCHuman-Computer Interaction cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Oct 2022 to Feb 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • Not unrealistic -- it just causes people to be very, very careful about not fooling themselves. Do you really believe that this practice is unrealistic because anyone with a model that doesn't do well on the held-out set will simply engage in fraud? That is a very, very cynical…

      zamfiView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.