The jet and resolved features of the central supermassive black hole of M 87 observed with EHT · HackerPapers discussions

The jet and resolved features of the central supermassive black hole of M 87 observed with EHT — mentioned by TheBlight

Wed, 15 May 2024 19:08:58 GMT

FWIW, it's not clear that SgA* is actually a canonical black hole (nor that even such a thing truly exists in nature.) The EHT image is taken as confirmation but the accuracy of that technique has been called into question: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.04623 Edit: In response to the downvotes, here are 2 very good sources who at least argue against the existence of singularities and their event horizons. 1: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.00841 2: https://uncnewsarchive.unc.edu/2014/09/23/carolinas-laura-me... I don't know exactly when science discussion turned into rigid dogma enforcement but we…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

The jet and resolved features of the central supermassive black hole of M 87 observed with EHT — mentioned by belter

Sat, 14 May 2022 22:24:56 GMT

PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.04623.pdf "We report our independent image reconstruction of the M 87 from the public data of the Event Horizon Telescope Collaborators (EHTC). Our result is different from the image published by the EHTC. Our analysis shows that (a) the structure at 230 GHz is consistent with those of lower frequency VLBI observations, (b) the jet structure is evident at 230 GHz extending from the core to a few mas, though the intensity rapidly decreases along the axis, and (c) the “unresolved core” is resolved into bright three features presumably showing an initial jet with…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

The jet and resolved features of the central supermassive black hole of M 87 observed with EHT — HN submission

Sat, 14 May 2022 22:24:55 GMT

Jet and resolved features of the central black hole M87 observed with EHT

18 points; 5 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.