<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNet · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.04596/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.04596/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNet — mentioned by gwern</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41929511</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2205.04596:41929511</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 21:41:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Is there much in the way of datasets of things that are recognizable but triggering incorrect something-or-other (what is it exactly? Semantic sensations?) There are some datasets which collect &amp;#x27;hard&amp;#x27; examples. One I love for the title alone is &amp;quot;When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNet&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.04596#google , Vasudevan et al 2022. The errors can be pretty interesting: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.04596#page=18 You can often see why a model might make a mistake and that you would too. (Like that first one of a swing - I would think it&amp;#x27;s…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.04596/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNet — mentioned by Datenstrom</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31410811</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2205.04596:31410811</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 14:03:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Link to the actual paper [1] for anyone who wants to skip the blog like me. Its a good read covering some problems I have been working on for a while. [1]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.04596.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.04596/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
