<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Experimental determination of the QCD effective charge $α_{g_1}(Q)$ · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.01169/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.01169/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Experimental determination of the QCD effective charge $α_{g_1}(Q)$ — mentioned by dguest</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32410315</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2205.01169:32410315</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:39:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately this is usually plotted as momentum vs coupling, which, if you wave your hands around the uncertainty principle enough, is sort of the reciprocal of the same thing. You can find a plot in the preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01169&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.01169/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item><item><title>Experimental determination of the QCD effective charge $α_{g_1}(Q)$ — mentioned by dguest</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32410264</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2205.01169:32410264</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:33:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Link to preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01169&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2205.01169/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
