<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Observation of large scale precursor correlations between cosmic rays and earthquakes · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2204.12310/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2204.12310/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Observation of large scale precursor correlations between cosmic rays and earthquakes — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36574173</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2204.12310:36574173</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 15:21:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Large scale precursor correlations between cosmic rays and earthquakes (2022)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;59 points; 8 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2204.12310/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.geo-ph</category></item><item><title>Observation of large scale precursor correlations between cosmic rays and earthquakes — mentioned by idlewords</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36359237</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2204.12310:36359237</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 16:21:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The key claim in the paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.12310.pdf) is that there are detectable changes in cosmic ray activity around 15 days before major seismic events. One posited mechanism is that stuff happens deep in the earth that affects the magnetic field first, and then kicks off some big earthquake. But they don&amp;#x27;t rule out loopier ideas (like sunspot activity driving changes in the Earth&amp;#x27;s dynamo that then kick off earthquakes). One thing that troubles me in the paper is that the researchers appear to have gone looking for precursor patterns in an ad hoc way, with no physical theory…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2204.12310/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.geo-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
