SciTS: A Benchmark for Time-Series Databases in Scientific Experiments and Industrial Internet of Things · HackerPapers discussions

SciTS: A Benchmark for Time-Series Databases in Scientific Experiments and Industrial Internet of Things — mentioned by zX41ZdbW

Wed, 01 Feb 2023 23:59:37 GMT

Interesting to match with the observations from the practice of using ClickHouse[1][2] for time series: 1. Reordering to SOA helps a lot - this is the whole point of column-oriented databases. 2. Specialized codecs like Gorilla[3], DoubleDelta[4], and FPC[5] lose to simply using ZSTD[6] compression in most cases, both in compression ratio and in performance. 3. Specialized time-series DBMS like InfluxDB or TimescaleDB lose to general-purpose relational OLAP DBMS like ClickHouse [7][8][9]. [1] https://clickhouse.com/blog/optimize-clickhouse-codecs-compr... [2]…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

SciTS: A Benchmark for Time-Series Databases in Scientific Experiments and Industrial Internet of Things — mentioned by zX41ZdbW

Thu, 27 Oct 2022 12:25:46 GMT

Here is a recent comparison: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.09795.pdf Although I'm not sure if it is using the new IOx engine or not.

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

SciTS: A Benchmark for Time-Series Databases in Scientific Experiments and Industrial Internet of Things — mentioned by zX41ZdbW

Wed, 05 Oct 2022 18:58:34 GMT

ClickHouse supports ad-hoc analytics, real-time reporting, and time series workloads at the same time. It is perfectly suited for user-facing analytics services. It supports low-latency (<100ms) queries for real-time analytics as well as high query throughput (500 QPS and more) - all of this with real-time data ingestion of logs, events, and time series. Take some notable examples from the list: https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/about-us/adopters/, something around web analytics, APM, ad networks, telecom data... ClickHouse is perfectly suited for these use cases. But if you try to align these…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.