<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Formal Language Recognition by Hard Attention Transformers: Perspectives from Circuit Complexity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2204.06618/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2204.06618/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Formal Language Recognition by Hard Attention Transformers: Perspectives from Circuit Complexity — mentioned by nyrikki</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39487869</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2204.06618:39487869</guid><pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2024 00:23:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;No, just a programmer that has to apply math. Transformers can only do what is called weak negation. if (not (goal X)), then (assert not x) One example I have seen is: &amp;quot;you can cross if you have no information on a train coming” VS: &amp;quot;you can cross if you have evidence that no train is coming&amp;quot; See the difference? As to what &amp;#x27;transformers&amp;#x27; can encode is ambiguous and depends on many factors but here is some light reading. https://direct.mit.edu/tacl/article/doi/10.1162/tacl_a_00493... https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06618&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2204.06618/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CC</category></item></channel></rss>
