<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Are We Really Making Much Progress in Text Classification? A Comparative Review · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2204.03954/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2204.03954/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Are We Really Making Much Progress in Text Classification? A Comparative Review — mentioned by PaulHoule</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35070531</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2204.03954:35070531</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2023 15:53:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I like it! But... I am doing something like this for my intelligent feed reader but using local models instead of the GPT API and using moderate-shot instead of zero-shot. Models like RoBERTa and miniLM frequently can learn pretty good models with a few hundred or thousand examples. I&amp;#x27;d point to https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.03954.pdf Now for years people thought it would be more scalable for some big co (say Facebook) to train a big model for everybody but that list in there of problems, particularly 2-7 and 10-12 are problems that only exist for the big company and that have to do with…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2204.03954/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
