HackerPapers

arXiv:2203.09346math.NA

Error estimates for physics informed neural networks approximating the Navier-Stokes equations

Tim De Ryck, Ameya D. Jagtap, Siddhartha Mishra

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We prove rigorous bounds on the errors resulting from the approximation of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with (extended) physics informed neural networks. We show that the underlying PDE residual can be made arbitrarily small for tanh neural networks with two hidden layers. Moreover, the total error can be estimated in terms of the training error, network size and number of quadrature points. The theory is illustrated with numerical experiments.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
math.NANumerical Analysis cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Mar 2024 to Mar 2024.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I would be interested to see how the formula looks for a more complicated equation. For example, Eq 3.12 or 3.31 in the link https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.09346.pdf

      trueismyworkView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.