<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The strong coupling constant: State of the art and the decade ahead · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.08271/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.08271/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The strong coupling constant: State of the art and the decade ahead — mentioned by photochemsyn</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32412662</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2203.08271:32412662</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:34:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Wikipedia&amp;#x27;s discussion seems pretty good. Fundamentally, force calculations in classical physics tend to be replaced by perturbation calculations in quantum mechanics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coupling_constant &amp;gt; &amp;quot;A coupling plays an important role in dynamics. For example, one often sets up hierarchies of approximation based on the importance of various coupling constants. In the motion of a large lump of magnetized iron, the magnetic forces may be more important than the gravitational forces because of the relative magnitudes of the coupling constants. However, in classical mechanics…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.08271/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
