<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference time · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.05482/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.05482/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference time — mentioned by bwhitty</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48530939</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2203.05482:48530939</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 18:37:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;As another poster above linked, it’s been shown to be effective since 2022: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.05482&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.05482/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference time — mentioned by woadwarrior01</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48530629</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2203.05482:48530629</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 18:13:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s is a well known idea[1], although it&amp;#x27;s still surprising that something as simple, even works. [1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.05482&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.05482/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference time — mentioned by magicalhippo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47262414</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2203.05482:47262414</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 15:08:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe some newer references are better, but my mind went to the Model Soups paper[1]: The conventional recipe for maximizing model accuracy is to (1) train multiple models with various hyperparameters and (2) pick the individual model which performs best on a held-out validation set, discarding the remainder. In this paper, we revisit the second step of this procedure in the context of fine-tuning large pre-trained models, where fine-tuned models often appear to lie in a single low error basin. We show that averaging the weights of multiple models fine-tuned with different hyperparameter…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.05482/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference time — mentioned by magicalhippo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42556619</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2203.05482:42556619</guid><pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 05:21:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is probably a dumb idea, but I&amp;#x27;ll air it anyway. I just stumbled upon the model soup[1] paper where, as I understand it, they average weights of fine-tuned models and get an model that performs better. They have a more involved algorithm but even the uniform soup (simple weight average) seems to perform well. In your paper you mention that especially in late stages the gradients of microbatches are often not aligned, hence the agreement filtering. What you&amp;#x27;re doing, from my brief glossing over, is effectively to do a k-means clustering with outlier rejection pass with k = 1. You then use…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.05482/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
