<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Code Red: The Business Impact of Code Quality -- A Quantitative Study of 39 Proprietary Production Codebases · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.04374/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.04374/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Code Red: The Business Impact of Code Quality -- A Quantitative Study of 39 Proprietary Production Codebases — mentioned by gspencley</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42435659</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2203.04374:42435659</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:29:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Code quality does not affect final product quality IMHO. What we need, admittedly, is more research and study around this. I know of one study which supports my position, but I&amp;#x27;m happy to admit that the data is sparse. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.04374 From the abstract: &amp;quot;By analyzing activity in 30,737 files, we find that low quality code contains 15 times more defects than high quality code.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.04374/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>Code Red: The Business Impact of Code Quality -- A Quantitative Study of 39 Proprietary Production Codebases — mentioned by nephrenka</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30711304</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2203.04374:30711304</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 14:07:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is indeed something that the academic research paper (see https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.04374) identifies as Future Work. There could be a code familiarity component that explains the large risks and variations. From the paper: &amp;quot;Could it be that changes done by the main author are faster and more predictable than corresponding changes made by a minor contributor? We suspect that author experience could be a factor that impacts the predictability of changes to low quality code.&amp;quot; If that turns out to be the case, then it would highlight organizational dimensions of low quality code: key…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.04374/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
