<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Occupancy Flow Fields for Motion Forecasting in Autonomous Driving · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.03875/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.03875/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Occupancy Flow Fields for Motion Forecasting in Autonomous Driving — mentioned by cs702</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33216070</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2203.03875:33216070</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2022 16:19:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#x27;d sum up your points 1,2,3 as &amp;quot;more data&amp;quot;. This would be a reason to think they can one day be ahead if they can take advantage of this, but not evidence that they are currently ahead. I&amp;#x27;d sum up those three points as &amp;quot;more data and more real-world, open-ended, large-scale testing by regular people.&amp;quot; Big difference. &amp;gt; Occupancy networks: waymo has published research on this before Tesla announced this at AI day (not clear to me who got there first though https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.03875v1.pdf) AFAIK, Tesla FSD Beta is the only system that has been using these DNNs for open-ended testing.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.03875/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.RO</category></item><item><title>Occupancy Flow Fields for Motion Forecasting in Autonomous Driving — mentioned by dontreact</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33215610</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2203.03875:33215610</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2022 15:22:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;d sum up your points 1,2,3 as &amp;quot;more data&amp;quot;. This would be a reason to think they can one day be ahead if they can take advantage of this, but not evidence that they are currently ahead. Occupancy networks: waymo has published research on this before Tesla announced this at AI day (not clear to me who got there first though https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.03875v1.pdf) Tesla&amp;#x27;s Dojo -&amp;gt; Waymo has TPUs to train on To me all of this is outweighed by the fact that Waymo has a driverless deployment and Tesla does not. I am pretty biased because as a Tesla owner I am pretty pissed off at this point at how…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.03875/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.RO</category></item></channel></rss>
