<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Gravitationally induced decoherence vs space-time diffusion: testing the quantum nature of gravity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.01982/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.01982/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Gravitationally induced decoherence vs space-time diffusion: testing the quantum nature of gravity — mentioned by eigenket</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39690460</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2203.01982:39690460</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:10:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#x27;t think its premature when we have stuff like the model of Oppenheim et. al. which appears to predict stuff which we can observe from astronomical data. This paper [1] also discusses some experimental tests of their model which are not too technologically insane (you don&amp;#x27;t have to put a planet in superposition). Pars of the parameter space of their model are already ruled out by stuff we already know and more can be excluded with a combination of deriving better theoretical bounds (their analysis is quite coarse to simplify things) and better experiments. I don&amp;#x27;t think its very…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.01982/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Gravitationally induced decoherence vs space-time diffusion: testing the quantum nature of gravity — mentioned by eigenket</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39651361</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2203.01982:39651361</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 13:04:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with your point in general, but in this case specifically I strongly disagree. The idea worked out by Oppenheim and his colleagues/students is a fairly concrete theory which aims to marry quantum mechanics and general relativity. They&amp;#x27;re working on a bunch of approaches to turn their model into testable predictions in different regimes. They have a bunch of different papers with different ways their model could be falsified. None of them are at the level where you could falsify their model with current technology but they&amp;#x27;re seriously working on the theory required to make their ideas…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.01982/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Gravitationally induced decoherence vs space-time diffusion: testing the quantum nature of gravity — mentioned by defrost</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38527534</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2203.01982:38527534</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 05:48:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Jonathan Oppenheim: If you&amp;#x27;d like to attend a public lecture (virtual or in London) about the postquantum theory of classical gravity, or contribute a donation to the group&amp;#x27;s research program, click &amp;quot;Donate&amp;quot; to add your email address to our list. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/oppenheim/ https://www.ucl.ac.uk/oppenheim/research.html See Also: Gravitationally induced decoherence vs space-time diffusion: testing the quantum nature of gravity (March 2022) https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.01982.pdf Is it time to rethink quantum gravity? (March 2023) https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.12221.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2203.01982/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
