HackerPapers

arXiv:2202.11845quant-ph

Benchmarking the Planar Honeycomb Code

Craig Gidney, Michael Newman, Matt McEwen

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We improve the planar honeycomb code by describing boundaries that need no additional physical connectivity, and by optimizing the shape of the qubit patch. We then benchmark the code using Monte Carlo sampling to estimate logical error rates and derive metrics including thresholds, lambdas, and teraquop qubit counts. We determine that the planar honeycomb code can create a logical qubit with one-in-a-trillion logical error rates using 7000 physical qubits at a 0.1% gate-level error rate (or 900 physical qubits given native two-qubit parity measurements). Our results cement the honeycomb code as a promising candidate for two-dimensional qubit architectures with sparse connectivity.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
Quantum 6, 813 (2022)
DOI
doi:10.22331/q-2022-09-21-813
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Oct 2024 to Oct 2024.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Overall this article looks pretty good. There was one major numerical error I noticed, but then the article corrected itself at the end. This was the error: > With an error rate of 1% the surface error correction code requires ~ 500 physical qubits required to encode one logical…

      StrilancView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.