HackerPapers

arXiv:2202.08137cs.LG

A data-driven approach for learning to control computers

Peter C Humphreys, David Raposo, Toby Pohlen, Gregory Thornton, Rachita Chhaparia, Alistair Muldal, Josh Abramson, Petko Georgiev, Alex Goldin, Adam Santoro, Timothy Lillicrap

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

It would be useful for machines to use computers as humans do so that they can aid us in everyday tasks. This is a setting in which there is also the potential to leverage large-scale expert demonstrations and human judgements of interactive behaviour, which are two ingredients that have driven much recent success in AI. Here we investigate the setting of computer control using keyboard and mouse, with goals specified via natural language. Instead of focusing on hand-designed curricula and specialized action spaces, we focus on developing a scalable method centered on reinforcement learning combined with behavioural priors informed by actual human-computer interactions. We achieve state-of-the-art and human-level mean performance across all tasks within the MiniWob++ benchmark, a challenging suite of computer control problems, and find strong evidence of cross-task transfer. These results demonstrate the usefulness of a unified human-agent interface when training machines to use computers. Altogether our results suggest a formula for achieving competency beyond MiniWob++ and towards controlling computers, in general, as a human would.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, PMLR 162, 2022
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2022 to May 2022. Found in 1 HN submission from Feb 2022 to Feb 2022. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. The Scaling Hypothesis (2021) 1 comment
    • > If GPT-6 was only larger, it would still only know the things in its training set, whereas a human can take arbitrary time to think, can go out and perform experiments, can Google/GPT things themselves, etc. A GPT model already has many ways of thinking and self-distilling…

      gwernView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.